A Newsday article covered the slaughter of Coptic Christians in Egypt that left dozens dead. Muslim extremists took credit for the killings. Go to http://www.newsday.com/long-island/killings-shock-long-island-s-coptic-christians-1.13669730
The article features a brief interview with a Coptic Christian couple on Long Island who were understandably upset with the massacres. To quote from Newsday, "Still, they did not blame Muslims in general. “It’s not a question of religion,” Nabil Awad said. “It’s a question of terrorists. Some people put in their heads that this is the way you are going to heaven, if you kill a Coptic Christian.”
It is admirable that they obviously do not blame Muslims in general - they should not and they do not. But to absolve the concept of religion is incredible. The murders were precisely all about religion - it is the religion that inspired the terrorists to perpetrate the terrorism. As Mr. Awad said, "Some people put in their heads that this is the way you are going to heaven, if you kill a Coptic Christian.”"
This is not socialism, capitalism, libertarianism, conservatism, anarchism, liberalism, communism or fascism or any secular ideology at work; it is a fundamentalist religious ideology at work, the religion of the followers of ISIS or Al Qaeda.
It is incredible but typical that many religious persons will deny the completely religious motivation of religious terrorists in an effort to absolve the concept of religious belief from any blame - but they are just in denial. Holding a belief beyond question, holding a belief that is at complete odds with the evidence and holding a belief no matter how much misery it continues to create is the exact problem and it is the problem we continue to refuse to acknowledge.
What are they worried about? Religion or some ideology is not a person; religion does not have feelings; it does not even have rights - people have rights. Yes people have rights to believe what they choose to BELIEVE but they do not have the right to DO anything they want. You should be able to say the obvious truth about a religion, that is part of the right of religious freedom - and who is harmed by your opinion? Well, there is an answer to that question; the person who has their "feelings" harmed is the person that has placed their religion or the very concept of religion beyond question, and cannot objectively judge the value of religion by its consequences - even when dozens of innocent people are killed because of it. There should be and there is no right to never having your feelings harmed.
Until it is generally admitted by most of humanity that evidence matters, that everything can be questioned, even one's faith and the faith of others, and that what really matters are the consequences of our actions and beliefs, we will not have a winning argument against those who have a deep faith in their murderous ideologies.