Wednesday, October 11, 2006

The Difference BEtween Republicans and Democrats

In the aftermath of the Mark Foley scandal, you probably have heard Republican apologists make this argument: the difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Rep. Foley's behavior was unnaceptable and that he was forced to resign from office while the immoral Bill Clinton was supported by his party.

Let us take a close look at the logic of this statement: the evidence is mounting that instead of forcing Mark Foley out of office for his behavior, it seems that for a number of years his behavior was ignored and actually tolerated because of his fundraising and electability.  It may be that even the Republican speaker of the House may have known something about all this and did nothing - until the whole thing became publicly known.  And to cap it all off, Mark Foley resigned BEFORE anyone put any pressure on him to resign.

To these charges, Republican apologists then say they also demand that those who knew also should resign; thereby cleansing the Party from all guilt.

Please! 

The fact remains that the bulk of current scandalous behavior resides on the Republican side of the aisle.  For every Bill Clinton you had a Henry Hyde and Newt Gingrich; for every Democrat on the take you have numerous Republicans taking money from Abramoff or profiting from Halliburton.

But here is the key to the Republican apologist thinking: morality is all about sex and that Republicans are granted forgiveness by God.

Yes, in the twisted mind of the Religious Right/Neo-con Republican, torture is not a moral issue; all things sex are moral issues.

The Deomcrats, to their detriment, but also to their credit, do not claim they are more moral than Republicans or blessed by God.  A large portion of the American Electorate hearing the Republicans claim exactly that, believe it and vote Republican.

The result: sex outside marriage is the great moral outrage of our time while torture is just another foregn policy tool.

They can keep their blessings.

Tuesday, October 3, 2006

Why We Don't Vote

In recent years, Americans have become notorious for not voting.  To make matters worse, it would seem that those who are ignorant yet certain may actually vote more often than those who are informed and racked with doubts.  The result: the elected officials now in office.

Obviously this habit of not voting is not genetic; therefore it must be cultural and the question becomes "Why have Americans become conditioned into not voting?"

The factors are numerous and they conspire together to keep people apathetic, disgusted and, yes certain in their ignorance.

First the level of political discourse is unbelievably low.  Since the media is now omnipresent, from radio, TV, print media and the Internet, we are blasted with more nonsense than ever.  Journalism is a dying art; what we get are spinmeisters masquerading as journalists - and some not even bothering to make the effort to seem like a journalist.

Do you remember Rush Limbaugh describing the events at Abu Ghraib as just some soldiers "blowing off some steam"?  Did Rush ever argue that Saddam was just "blowing off some steam"?  Looking back, it could be argued that this outrage began the complete unraveling of any remaining <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />US moral authority in the conflict.  After Abu Ghraib we could not even claim to have ended the torture of the Saddam Hussein years in Iraq.  Now it is clear that torture is an integral part of the “new” Iraq and perpetuated by the previously victimized Shiites.  Of all the things they chose to learn from the US

The relative comfort that Americans live in also also contributes to political apathy.  As long as one is fat and happy, one remains uninvolved.  In fact, being involved is viewed as a nuisance.  Many persons take the blessings of liberty for granted and are ready to give up some liberties if they’re merely told without evidence that it’s too much trouble to retain them!

Another problem has become the absolute garbage that campaigning has become.  "Swift-boating" is now a part of the language.  What it means is that even an American's heroism in service to their country can be trashed for base political purposes.  No fact is safe from not only questioning, but complete reversal, no matter the actual evidence.  Nothing means anything in politics.  This only serves to destroy interest in voting except on the part of the “true believers.”

Recently more news stories have served to destroy the average citizen’s interest in politics: the new book by Bob Woodward, “State of Denial,” and the scandal involving Congressman Mark Foley.

The Woodward book claims that the Bush Administration tolerated no dissent from their dogmatic view of the world, particularly when it came to Iraq policy.  The results are obvious.  Yet about 40% of Americans remain in this state of denial, not to mention the Administration.  To this day, the President and Vice President will not tell the general public what the Intelligence Community tells them about the future of Iraq – e.g.: that it’s deteriorating badly.  Instead we hear the unjustifiably optimistic untruths – e.g.: the insurgency is in its “death throes.”  At the same time, the opposition party is inexplicably cowardly in voicing its outrage.  Perhaps they fear that such passion will scare off likely voters who hate bad news and the bearers of bad news.

Congressman Foley’s Internet contacts with under-age pages may have been the subject of a cover-up so that a valuable Republican Congressional seat might not be lost in this year’s elections.  It certainly seems possible that power was chosen over the well being of children – does this sound familiar?

Even though we’re a country at war, the administration has made sure that only a few families understand the agony of the loss of their loved ones by limiting the losses to volunteers largely coming from families of the poor or from the families of “true believers,” and that only future generations will have to pay for the war’s costs.  It all adds up to an uninvolved, uninformed, apathetic electorate.

And if there is anything that this Administration needs to have, it’s an ignorant, apathetic citizenry that is told nothing in response to asking for nothing.

Meanwhile the debt, in both financial and moral terms, mounts.

What are you doing on Election Day?